Schools

Court Rules in Favor of Johns Hopkins on Belward Farm Development

Family of former farm owner considering appeal, blogger writes.

 

A Montgomery County Circuit judge ruled Friday that a lawsuit against Johns Hopkins University seeking to block the university's plans to develop a science park on the former Belward Farm should not proceed.

Judge Ronald B. Rubin ruled in favor of Johns Hopkins' motion for summary judgment in the lawsuit filed against the university by Timothy Newell and others regarding plans to build a 4.7 million-square-foot commercial science park on the property.

Find out what's happening in Rockvillewith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Heirs of the farm's former owner say the size and the scope of the science park go far beyond the small campus that was envisioned when majority owner Elizabeth Banks agreed to sell the farm to Hopkins in 1989. 

The decision effectively ends the case, barring an appeal.

Find out what's happening in Rockvillewith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Johns Hopkins released the following statement on Friday:

“Johns Hopkins is, and always will be, grateful to Miss Banks and her relatives for the gift of their property. We have lived up to, and will always live up to, our agreement with them.

“We will need time to fully assess the judge’s decision. But, obviously, we are greatly pleased with his ruling that the university’s agreement with the Banks family is clear and unambiguous. Our focus now will be on proceeding, over time, with development of the Belward Research Campus. We will proceed in a responsible manner, in consultation with the community and in support of Montgomery County’s vision for its economic development.”

Donna Baron, coordinator of the The Gaithersburg-North Potomac-Rockville Coalition, who has blogged regularly on the case, wrote on Patch on Friday that she had spoken with Newell.

Newell, the nephew of Banks, said he would discuss a possible appeal with his lawyer, Baron wrote.

"It is such a disappointment but it is not unlike most issues in the county where the residents object to the county’s plans," wrote Baron. "In the end, the county does exactly what they decided to do in the first place."


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here