Students arriving for the first day of school at in Rockville on Monday were greeted by more than a standard “Welcome Back” message on the school signboard.
Anti-abortion demonstrators stood at both sides of the entrance to the driveway on Scott Drive, displaying banner-sized photos of aborted fetuses.
“We were aware that there were folks near the school,” said Lesli Maxwell, a Montgomery County Public Schools spokeswoman. “We don’t know who they were but the school contacted the police."
County police officers asked the demonstrators to move off school property, said Officer Janelle Smith, a Montgomery County Police Department spokewoman. They complied, standing on the sidewalk on either side of the driveway. After additional discussion with officers, the demonstrators chose to leave.
Despite the banners and police presence, students arriving at school entered the building without delay or incident.
"We don't demonstrate. We are an advocacy arm for the Maryland Catholic Bishops. Most of our work is here in Annapolis, meeting with lobbyists and legislators. We do help the three dioceses that are in Maryland and we don assist them in their educational outreach effort but it's to parishioners in the pew." Kathy Dempsey, Spokesperson, Maryland Catholic Conference. "Our mission has more of a legislative focus. We are not involved in demonstrations." Jeffrey Meister, Director of Administration and Legislation, Maryland Right to Life, Inc.
As for MCPS, when my first grader came home with Daddy has a room mate and Heather has two mommies, I HAD TO SIGN A PERMISSION FORM, agreeing to have this material presented to my child. That's the big difference. Those protesters took away MY CHOICE. We live in America, land of the free. Free to choose, choose how and when or IF I want such delicate issues presented to MY child. There is a time and place for all this debate, but the first day of school. Really? You've just proven that "Nothing Is Sacred".
Your last comment is spot on "Nothing is Sacred"..............yes not even life!!!
I say to you, birth control is 100% effective in causing pregnancy. It's not a matter of if, it's a matter of who and when.
5:13pm on Tuesday, August 30, 2011 The terms I use are anti-abortion and pro-abortion, since the issue that's up for discussion is abortion. Sorry, Gina. You're wrong and that isn't the style for journalism. There is no such thing as "pro-abortion." Please use pro-choice and even pro-life if you choose. But "pro-abortion" is ridiculous and inaccurate.
2:43pm on Wednesday, August 31, 2011 Your comment: "Sure, he's got some input if in the a stable relationship, but what about in the case of rape? At the end of the day, over the course of the next ~ 9 months, it's a woman's body, hers alone, that goes through all the changes, sometimes at the risk of her own life, to form this potential new child, while the man merely holds your hand while you painfully push " "potential" stable relationship? I don't think anyone here is arguing that in the case of rape or if the health of the "potential Mother" is in question then an abortion might be prudent. I've seen the number thrown around of 115K babies killed everyday. If true, that's an awful lot of "potential" children killed.....stable relationship or not! Kind of "barbaric" don't you think?
Was this taken out of context, too? You are simply an angry, vicious woman.
I agree with you. However, that earlier assertion--which even gave a name--has been removed from this site. It was false. But it does show the mindset of this group and they didn't even have the right target. Even worse.
Nice retraction...........I suppose it's not correct for white people to protest against racism against blacks?
4:32pm on Wednesday, August 31, 2011 "YOUR COMMENT" Barbaric is forcing all women and girls to carry pregnancies to term. Are you aware of the reasons why women would go to Dr. Tiller? It's not because they simply changed their minds at the last minute. Barbaric is sticking YOUR nose into the reproductive business of women you don't know. Barbaric is hanging out outside middle schools harassing children with disgusting, misleading propaganda. I don't care if one of them has a father who performs abortions, you are a vile piece of work if you think this does anything to help your cause. Your disrespect for other people's children only proves that it's not actual life that you care about. Thanks for the name calling and personal attacks, another trait used by the abortion supporters. So it appears you are trying to "compare" which cause is more barbaric than the other. I will agree with you on this point though, I would NOT have held a protest at the school or any school for that matter. That was a mistake, but on the bright side........no children were killed. As for barbaric behavior, I stand by my earlier statement. Check the definition of barbarism.........abortion fits the mold.
You are 100% wrong to believe that our students 'learn' about abortion. I guarantee you they are not shown photos of abortion. I guarantee you they aren't told how abortion leads to mental illness, psychosis, depression and suicide. I guarantee you they aren't teaching that to have an abortion is to kill their very own children who are created out of their DNA. As far as the 'emotional and mental harm' issue goes, the United States Holocaust museum website encourages teaching the Holocaust to children as early as 4th grade. http://www.ushmm.org/education/foreducators/guideline/
I'm curious also. Did "Patch" ask them who they were?
Peter--are you Jack Ames, or are you affiliated with Jack Ames, of defendlife.org? If not, please tell us who you are. Is it a coincidence that your page "Face the Truth Tour" uses the exact same poster images that appear in the Patch story here? Do your tactics now include targeting middle schools and under the circumstances you chose (first day of school, for maximum attention and disruption to students, parents and staff? What exactly do you consider it your right to do, in terms your protests? What is your opinion on violence, such as the murder of Dr. Tiller? Do you or Jack have children in school yourself? I'd really like some information so I can try to better understand. Here's the website: http://www.defendlife.org Defend Life, btw, says it does not target children. ..."But children shouldn't see these images..." "Please note that our target audience is not children, but adults who do not realize how horrifying abortion is. Yet it is not possible to completely avoid having children see the images." Going directly to a school would seem to violate this principle as it is surely more than an inadvertent exposure tactic, as well as a practice that folks on both sides of the issue find deplorable.
Perhaps this is the same Peter posting here. In another talk Peter says it's time to "lift the veil." I request that he do the same and address my questions. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQGBpdp-wIo Why won't you say who you are?
Personally I would not have chosen to demonstrate at any school (outside of a college) but the group that did show up at Frost broke no laws and were well within their rights. I have daughters and one has been through Frost. She has been educated on this topic and wouldn't have been "traumatized".
Two posts asking who the group was behind this is not an obsession. They must be ashamed of what they did or else they'd take credit for it.