.
Feedback

Children Could Lose If Budget Cuts Target Federal Nutrition Programs

With the highest rates of participation in federal nutrition programs, children stand to be hurt the worst by cuts.

First of a series

The bipartisan budget committee's decisions on how to cut the deficit by $1.2 trillion could have a direct effect on children in our region.

Hunger and nutrition advocates are concerned that the committee, which has a Nov. 23 deadline, will propose cuts to federal nutrition assistance programs.

"If federal funding were reduced, we'd have to make up for it with local and state funding, or we'd have to cut back," said Paul Regnier, spokesman for . "Either the families would have to come up with the money somehow, or the kids wouldn't have another option."

Despite the region's wealth, one in six children in Northern Virginia and Montgomery County are struggling with hunger.

"The increased participation is tied to poverty in the area. Families don't have food at home, which is an issue we need to address," said Marla Caplon, director of food and nutrition services for .

Fairfax is an affluent county, Regnier said, but it has pockets of poverty with more students qualifying for free or reduced priced lunches.

"It's hard for anyone to think about anything other than getting something to eat when they're hungry," Regnier said. "So for kids who are getting little or nothing to eat, it's difficult to learn. We don't have problems with that right now, because we do have these free and reduced priced programs for kids."

Edward Cooney, executive director of the Congressional Hunger Center, said observers can't predict what might happen to federal nutrition program budgets, because the super committee hasn't been transparent in its deliberations.

"But the House and Senate Agriculture committee chairs have recommended a $23 billion cut package, and $4 billion is rumored to be to SNAP [The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program]," he said. SNAP is the new name for the program that distributes food stamps.

But what Cooney, who has been closely involved with the fight against hunger for decades, stressed most was his concern that people might not understand who has the most to lose with cuts.

"When you're wondering what the face of people who use these nutrition assistance programs looks like, it's important to understand that it's everybody," he said. "It's people who are employed but struggling, the underemployed, the unemployed. It's old people, but mostly, it's children. So when you're talking about cutting back programs like SNAP, often times you're talking about cutting benefits to children. I don't think people know this."

By age 20, half of American children receive SNAP benefits, and 48 percent of SNAP recipients are children. In the greater Washington metro area, more than 200,000 children are struggling with hunger, according to estimates by the Capital Area Food Bank.

Even if more cuts are avoided, some organizations that depend on federal aid are already feeling the impact of a tightened budget. In August, the Manna Food Center in Gaithersburg was informed that it would receive no more canned or frozen proteins from the USDA Emergency Food Assistance Program through the end of the year. While Manna has secured donations from individuals and private businesses, without outside help, they will not have turkeys or other traditional protein items to give during the holiday season.

Percentage of students eligible for free and reduced-price meals 1999-2000 2008-2009 Montgomery County 22.3 27 Fairfax County 17.7 21.8 District of Columbia 54 67

Source: National Center for Education Statistics.

Upcoming:

Tomorrow: Manna Food Center in Gaithersburg is bracing for record numbers.

Wednesday: Program are making fresh produce more accessible to the region's needy.

hmj November 21, 2011 at 01:01 pm
Why do we allow other countries to export their poverty to the United States? Even in the recession the President and Congress allowed it to continue. No wonder we have some many on these poverty programs.
Jeff Klass November 21, 2011 at 03:29 pm
What a load of crap. This STUPOR committee will punt, because no politician save perhaps Ryan has the stones to actually try & rein in government. They are all spineless bought & paid for cronies & should all be voted out in 2012 - the good & the bad. We need term limits on all government jobs, elected & appointed and all judgeships. You are witnessing the fall of America from the indside out. Can't cut spending (not a cut - actually a reduction in the amount of growth) by 1.2 trillion over 10 years? What a joke. Did you know that the last debt ceiling deal INCREASES SPENDING BY 8 TRILLION OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS? No? Then you're a moron.
The pressure on the STUPOR committee, rather than automatic cuts 50% defense 50% domestic - should have been this: come up with cuts - REAL LIFE SPENDING CUTS by the deadline or face a firing squad. Then we implement another STUPOR committee & start the process over - we win either way - we either get REAL SPENDING CUTS - or we clean up D.C. -- 6 dems & 6 gop at a time.
Doug in Rockville November 21, 2011 at 08:47 pm
Jeff, you're entitled to your opinion, but in this, still the wealthiest country in the world, tax rates for the wealthy are at the lowest levels they've ever been in over 100 years. We can pay more to ensure that children have good nutrition. We do need to make cuts in lots of places--namely defense and corporate loopholes and other unnecessary subsidies that are 40 years outdated. But we do not need to sacrifice the middle class (or in many cases the lower-working-middle class) and the last vestiges of a safety net for those who have trouble. There is no crisis in this country other than 1) lack of good jobs (education, investment in infrstructure and technology will fix), and 2) political stagnation (thank you ideologues).
Jeff Klass November 21, 2011 at 08:55 pm
We do not have a revenue problem in this country. We have a SPENDING PROBLEM. Implement 15% REAL CUTS straight across the board - implemented over 3 years - a REAL 5% per year - not baselined - and watch the stock market, job creation and the rest of the economy SOAR. Or, keep looking to wealthy people to give more more more & watch Atlas shrug. You could take every penny from "rich" peoople - everything they earn - and it won't fund the feds for 365 days. Enough is enough. I love rich people. I am not one of them, but I hope to be. I do not fault them their wealth OR success - regardless of how obtained. Stop playing class war & get your head right - it is a SPENDING PROBLEM - waste & over spending due to baseline budgeting in every department. Wake up.
Doug in Rockville November 21, 2011 at 10:00 pm
Jeff, I don't think....scratch that....I know that you have no earthly idea what a 15% "real cuts straight across the board in 3 years" would do to our country, our economy, and particularly our most vulnerable citizens. To say the least, this approach would be an unmitigated disaster. The evidence of that is unarguable. Look around the world. Look at history--most notably, Japan's lost decade. Your insinuation that people who argue that wealthier people can afford to contribute more to the very social compact that has sustained them (indeed, allowed them to accumulate wealth in the first place) are waging class-warfare is just a crass, inaccurate protrayal. I am probably in the top 10% of earners although I'm certainly not in the top 1%. I'm willing. In fact, I hope I lose my Bush tax cut. I don't need it as much as my country does. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIRES A BALANCE OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE. Get the economy back on track before major cuts. Anyone educated in history and economics understands this.
Jeff Klass November 21, 2011 at 10:21 pm
No one but yourself is stopping you from sending the Treasury as much money as you want, so you lose that one. Bush cut taxes for EVERYONE - you want to end the Bush tax cuts - fine - that means REIMPLEMENTING the lowest (10%) bracket which was ELIMINATED by the Bush tax cuts. I'm all for that - those who use government assisstance most should have some skin in the game. You agree?
You cannot prove your statement because it has never happened in modern America - they never CUT anything. They strut around talking tough, but their "cuts" are simply reductions in the amount of increase. There are no cuts. Ever. There is NOT a revenue problem in this country. There is a spending problem. You don't want to balance expenditures - you want to feed the government pig MORE. How can you continue to reward the excessive failures of the government with MORE REVENUE? Would your house or business survive with the same fiscal actions? I'm guessing you're one of the first in line to sign the recall petition, too. How sad.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Rockville Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Brigitta Mullican June 2, 2013 at 11:58 pm
Twinbrook Swimming Pool (TSP) can hold three public open house days to introduce the pool toRead More perspective members. This year the dates are June 8, July 13 and August 10. The cost is $5 per person. The TSP has a big insurance policy to cover swimmers. Not sure free is appropriate. As a private membership pool, there are regulations that must be followed.
damian starr June 7, 2013 at 11:46 pm
Does either county or city pool offer free trial periods? I don't think so.
Brigitta Mullican June 7, 2013 at 11:51 pm
If you swim on the 3 open public swim days at the Twinbrook Swimming Pool, you can consider it aRead More trial. Liability insurance does cost money. Entrance of $5 is a real bargain. Members pay to maintain the pool.
Deborah Durham May 14, 2013 at 01:11 pm
I am so sorry this happened to your girls! There is no excuse for the theater personnel notRead More helping. I hope you get an apology from management. Perhaps the city police should have an officer in the area after the last movie.
Joe Shono May 14, 2013 at 08:09 pm
Yaaaay! Lets put it on the police again. Good thinking the Deb. How about Kate gets her daughter aRead More chaperone. Ask 2 people and then a movie theatre employee and then walk home? That story sounds really fishy. I don't believe the world is in as bad a shape as Kate purports.
Theresa Defino May 14, 2013 at 08:55 pm
I think more facts are necessary here. When you didn't hear from them you didn't go to theater toRead More find them? It is hard to know where blame lies here, not knowing how old these girls are. It sounds like your daughter and god daughter don't have their own phones? No matter my children's age, I make it a point to know the running times of the movies they're at, especially if I am the one who is going to be picking them up. We warn children--especially girls and young women--not to go to strangers for help. We know that of the three girls, the man kidnapped one who was his daughter's friend after giving her a lift.