patching...
Update: Get more community conversation. 'Like' Rockville Patch on Facebook. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Wallace Takes Aim at Van Hollen at Montgomery County Campaign Stop

Republican decries defunding of Social Security, lack of energy plan.

 

A white box truck with a “Wallace for Congress” banner, a podium, a candidate, a few campaign workers and a reporter made for a low-key campaign kickoff announcement in Rockville Town Center on Thursday for Dave Wallace, a businessman from Carroll County who is seeking the Republican nomination in Maryland’s 8th Congressional District.

Wallace stood in front of the Social Security Administration office on North Washington Street to highlight what he said is the defunding of Social Security.

“We need to keep promises made by government,” said Wallace, who decried what he called “phony promises” made by U.S. Rep. Christopher Van Hollen Jr. (D-Dist. 8) of Kensington that Wallace said included a “phony tax cut” that raided the Social Security Trust Funds.

“We need to reform spending and taxes and end subsidies,” said Wallace, who also called for “American energy independence through all available technologies,” a repeal of the health care reform law passed under President Barack Obama and protection of “Medicare and Social Security for the people who need them most—our senior citizens.”

Wallace, a father of three from Manchester, has owned and operated Chesapeake Kitchen Wholesalers, Inc. in Randallstown for more than 30 years.

As a business owner, Wallace said he knows each one of his employees well.

“I see what families go through with rising food prices, rising gas costs, where they have to go and make decisions,” he said in an interview.

With “$5 a gallon gasoline coming very shortly” the government has no energy plan, Wallace said.

“And if anything we’re restricting the use of our energy day-to-day for the concept that we can go after electric cars that aren’t even ready,” Wallace said. “You see the Chevy Volt, it’s caught on fire from poor manufacture.”

Wallace questioned whether electric car technology is ready.

“And yet because of government interdiction, General Motors is pushing it out whether it’s ready or not,” Wallace said. “And what we need to do is have a real American energy independence solution. And we don’t have that right now.”

Wallace faces three other Republicans in the April 3 primary—Gus Alzona, Shelly Skolnick and Ken Timmerman—but has his focus squarely on Van Hollen, who faces a primary challenge from George English.

George Gluck, a Green Party candidate, also will appear on the ballot for the Nov. 6 general election.

Van Hollen has held the 8th District seat since defeating Constance A. Morella (R) of Bethesda in 2002.

He has risen through the ranks of Democratic leadership, including a stint as chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, where he was charged with helping Democratic candidates win election to Congress during the 2008 and 2010 election cycles.

Wallace said he is not discouraged by the challenge of facing a powerful Democratic incumbent in a state where registered Democrats outnumber Republicans 2 to 1.

While the 8th District from which Van Hollen was first elected comprised the western and southern portions of Montgomery County and a small portion of Prince George’s County, the newly redrawn 8th District includes a much smaller portion of Montgomery County and large portions of Frederick and Carroll counties.

“This is no longer a county race,” Wallace said. “This is a regional race. This is a race that in 2002, when [Van Hollen] was elected over Connie Morella, there was a difference of a 2.5 percent swing between Democrats and Republicans.”

The newly redrawn district is “much more conservative,” Wallace said.

He predicted that he would “draw the conservative base as well as those people who are moderates and understand that the problems have to be resolved by someone who is willing to take a stand on these issues.”

Related Topics: Dave Wallace and elections 2012

Janice G. Dorn

6:14 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

Dave Wallace is the man with the real deal! Vote for him, because the issues he stands for and against are what MD needs!

Reply

Jerome Yurow

1:06 am on Sunday, January 15, 2012

<<With “$5 a gallon gasoline coming very shortly” the government has no energy plan, Wallace said>>
...
<<Wallace questioned whether electric car technology is ready.>>
These two statements reveal a "chicken and egg" problem in the United States.
Actually, $5 per gallon gasoline would be a good economic incentive for electric car production. Electric cars are being introduced on a large scale in both Israel and Denmark and to a lesser extent in Australia, Japan, and Hawaii. These cars are being introduced at a competitive price not at a premium price as in the U.S. The main reason why these cars and the BetterPlace (betterplace.com) system to support them has not reached the U.S. is because the price of gasoline here is too low for them to be competitive. Removal of tax breaks for the oil and gas industry would both raise revenues for the federal government and raise the price of gasoline, encouraging competitively priced electric vehicles and their support systems.

Reply

Frank M

8:17 am on Sunday, January 15, 2012

"The main reason why these cars and the BetterPlace (betterplace.com) system to support them has not reached the U.S. is because the price of gasoline here is too low for them to be competitive"...are you serious...are you that ignorant to assume raising gas prices by destroying supply venues will make American more electric car friendly... It takes cheap energy sources to compete in a global market and this is your solution...jack the American public and their places of employment with job crushing gas prices....what about those who can't afford a new "dream electric car" priced at 45,000 plus (with government subsidies)..What about those who will lose their jobs because of the crushing gas prices YOU WANT - who will subsidize the Volt then??? As I read you comment Jerome...all I see is you selling a product and profiting off the artificially created gas price structure to justify your product....subsidies...HA..look in the electric car mirror...

Reply

Jerome Yurow

2:52 pm on Sunday, January 15, 2012

The probable price of an electric car of the type supported by Better Place-- currently a Renault Fluence ZE-- in the U.S. will be around $20,000, not $45,000. The latter price is that being asked for those vehicles currently being sold in the U.S. You are right $45,000 is not a competitive price, $20,000, however, is. You can see for yourself what a Renault Fluence ZE looks like by checking out the Better Place site either at www.betterplace.com or through past tweets following betterplace on Twitter. I have yet to see a Renault Fluence ZE in the U.S. and I have not seen it mentioned in the U.S. press.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jerome Yurow

10:58 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Several people, off-line, have asked for more information on Better Place and the Renault ZE. This third-party article gives a good summary.

http://www.jonburg.com/future/2012/01/radical-dreamers-better-place.html

Common Sense

3:15 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012

Jerome, that was the point Mr. Wallace seemed to be making in his comments in regard to energy. He agrees that our attachment to foreign oil is troubling and it must be stopped. Meanwhile, allow the Free Market to determine what the American public are ready for. Electric cars are still far from beng the primier means of transportation, so let the United States use "all" types of energy production. If the Free Market switches over eventually to mainly electric vehicles, or natural gas... The United States should still utilize and tap into our oil resources here in the United States thus we can export it and increase our GDP significantly and put American workers back to work with decent wages. Common Sense.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jerome Yurow

4:06 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012

<<Meanwhile, allow the Free Market to determine what the American public are ready for>>

Absolutely agree. Part of my point, however, is that certain fuels are getting tax breaks that keep their prices lower than they otherwise would be in a free market. Notably oil and gas. I do not think that these forms of energy need these forms of indirect subsidy any more than other forms of energy need direct subsidies. Let's have a free market.

Leave a comment