patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Van Hollen’s Moment

His appointment to the 'super committee' provides an opportunity for Maryland's up-and-comer.

 
0 of 0
House Budget Committee ranking member Chris Van Hollen (D-8th) at a news conference July 25. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Photos (1)

Photos

House Budget Committee ranking member Chris Van Hollen (D-8th) at a news conference July 25.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi recently appointed one of Maryland’s own, Rep. Chris Van Hollen, to the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction. This is the so-called "super committee" that has been charged with finding $1.2 trillion to $1.5 trillion in federal budget deficit savings, to stave off the threat of severe automatic cuts that will be triggered if Republicans and Democrats fail to reach agreement. 

For Van Hollen, already a well-respected voice on budgetary issues and a rising star among House Democrats, the appointment carries both great opportunity and great risk. 

The opportunity is that his appointment underscores the rising position of influence he has attained within the House Democratic caucus. This can add to his appeal back home as a leader who can deliver the goods and make things happen for the people of Montgomery and Prince George's counties, or it can backfire.

Congress has never been held in lower esteem by voters nationally.  After the embarrassing spectacle of the debt ceiling debacle, voters are looking to leaders in both parties to stop the bickering and solve this thing, even if that means no one gets everything they want. Based on recent performance, the odds of them succeeding don’t look so good.  Yet, if an agreement does come together, Van Hollen (D-8th) could emerge as one of the leading voices on the Democratic side of the aisle. 

The biggest risk for him is if he tries to play it too safe. One of the core problems that has undermined Congress’s ability to function is the political pressure from back home in "safe" districts like Van Hollen's.  It may prove too tempting to play to the usual constituency groups that make up much of the local Democratic Party's activist base, which would argue against any substantive compromises on entitlement reform or taxes. The same is true on the Republican side.

Van Hollen and his fellow super committee members have some incredibly tough choices to make, and our local Representative is now on the hot seat. 

So will he try to placate his party's base by resisting any effort to compromise at all? Or will he stand up and press for a more comprehensive solution — even a politically risky one — that might risk upsetting his loyal Democratic base? 

Voters want this issue solved, and they expect members of Congress to compromise with each other when necessary for the greater good.  My money is on Van Hollen to rise to the occasion and find a way forward. What do you think?

Related Topics: Chris Van Hollen, Debt Ceiling Debate, and Super Committee

Raul

10:25 am on Monday, August 15, 2011

Rich I agree with you, that this appointment creates a great opportunity for Cong. VanHollen to seek a collective solution to the economic crisis in the Nation and in our region. Maryland/Montgomery County stand to gain quite a bit due to this appointment, so long as he keeps the focus on a sustainable solution that leads to growth in entrepreneurship and JOBS! One key area is the Green/Clean Technology industry that could create many jobs nationwide in BioMass, SMARTGrid, Agriculture/Food Supply and Alternative Energy.

Reply

JH

2:47 pm on Tuesday, August 16, 2011

We all seem to agree that he needs to stop the class warfare nonsense and start representing all the citizens. Cut the waste from the programs first and stop expanding welfare to people that should not be eligible to begin with. If you are looking for more revenue, you need to collect from free loaders and tax cheats.

Reply

Doug in Rockville

4:05 pm on Tuesday, August 16, 2011

"placate his party's base by resisting any effort to compromise at all"

That is a mischaracterization of what liberals are saying. Liberals want EQUITABLE sacrifice. That means revenues, and the people who are running away with wealth right now have not been asked to give up ANYTHING since 1993. Simply ending the Bush tax cuts in their entirety alone would cut the current deficit by more than half. Revenues from those who have been prospering in this recession hardly seems like a lot to ask, and polls of Americans regularly indicate that 65-80% of the people want this approach used (depending on how the question is asked). I am sorry, but this is NOT "class warfare nonsense", JH! We ignore the growing imbalance of wealth in this country at our own peril. Would we really sacrifice everything done over the last 100 years to build our middle class and make our country the beacon of hope and envy across the globe because the people who have the most are unwieldingly never asked to contribute more? While at the same time, working people can barely make ends meet, lose homes, can't afford to send their kids to college, can't get adequate health care or insurance to cover it, and feel more and more like their "American dream" is drifting away from them?

Reply

Doug in Rockville

4:06 pm on Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Talk to our relatively well-to-do neighbors even right here in Rockville, and even people making $80-90K per year are struggling. Something's not right. Look at the front page of the Washington Post today and there's a great article highlighting the disparity (Great Falls wealth).

Reply

Doug in Rockville

4:10 pm on Tuesday, August 16, 2011

The real problem is that WE THE PEOPLE no longer have government of, by, and for us. Corporations and the super-rich have exerted so much money, influence, and advantage over the rest of the country through controlling our political discourse and conversation to benefit themselves at the expense of the vast majority. It is time for the American people of all ages, political stripes, and locations to put a stop to it. Or it will destroy what is great about this country--"e pluribus unum".

Reply

Doug in Rockville

4:16 pm on Tuesday, August 16, 2011

One other important FACT--Social Security has NEVER in its entire history EVER contributed a single DIME to the deficit. Not one penny. It is not broken, and minor reforms will situate it very well far into the future. Medicare clearly needs some changes, as does Medicaid. But the solutions that focus solely on cutting benefits and not on addressing the drivers of cost (typically a small percentage of Medicaid patients drive 80-90% of costs) are not solutions at all. There was a Frontline story about a doctor in Camden, NJ (one of America's poorest cities) who got involved in the emergency care in area hospitals and started a non-profit who actually managed these 10-20% of patients driving huge cost increases, and by educating, assisting people in their living conditions, and other actions at the local level were able to reduce annual Medicaid expenditures in the city by about 40-50%. Cost containment and PATIENT MANAGEMENT is crucial. Also, addressing the hospital care system geared toward rapid inpatient treatment and release rather than holisitic healthcare that looks at the entire patient, takes into consideration other social factors, and is geared to keep people healthy would save billions.

Reply

Doug in Rockville

4:21 pm on Tuesday, August 16, 2011

We need to ask ourselves how an why almost every other major industrialized nation has healthier populations, universal health care coverage, mostly non-profit and regulated, and is spending on average only 8-12% of GDP on health care. Meanwhile, our for-profit, private insurance based system produces less healthy population while spending about 16-19% of our GDP on health care. Again, something is wrong.

Solutions, not rhetoric. Equitable sacrifice that does not gut opportunity and security for middle America, or keep our kids from getting an education that they work hard for and deserve. Ask those with historically low tax rates at the top to pitch in a little more again (even at 38% their contributions would be historically low!).

Reply

JH

1:08 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011

No more freeloaders. You pay for the education and health care needs of your own family! Too many people want others to pick up the bill ---- don't be a deadbeat. When half the households pay no federal income tax you know we have gone too far. Every household should contribute.

Reply

jnrentz1

1:09 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

Save money?

With the exception of food and medicine, permanently stop all Foreign Aid.

Use some or all of the money saved to finance medical research. The United States could gift to the world, treatments and cures for disease instead of our (tax payer) money.

Reply

jnrentz1

1:17 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

Save money?

In court charge a fee in civil cases for those who use foreign language interpreter services. I do not know what our courts language interpreters are currently paid, but a few years ago they were paid a minimum of $55.00 per hour, with a two hour minimum guaranteed.

In civil cases, that fee should be paid in advance by those utilizing the service.

Reply

jnrentz1

1:22 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

Save money?

Start a National Sales Tax (NST) of 1% on goods and goods only, costing between $1.00 and $20, 000.00. Services would not be subjected to the NST.

The NST would be be temporary expiring after ten years. The NST would be applied to the nation's debt, and only the nation's debt.

Reply

Leave a comment