patching...
Breaking: Longshot Oxbow Wins Preakness Stakes »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Time to Re-think Our Place in the World?

Montgomery County no longer in top 10 of county wealth.

 

For Montgomery County, the U.S. Census data released this week were a bit of an eye-opener.

Although we still like to still think of ourselves as one of the nation’s top five wealthiest counties — and used to rank second or third each year in the median family income rankings — we are now slipping lower and lower in this crucial measure, especially compared to the jurisdictions around us. We fell out of the top five a few years back, and now we’re no longer in the top 10.

So who's at the top this year? Once again, Loudoun County, Virginia, is the richest county in America. Following close behind are Fairfax County, in second, and Howard County in third. Several other counties in our area also make the top 10: Arlington County is fifth, Stafford County is seventh, Prince William is ninth. Montgomery has dropped all the way to 12th.

In terms of median family income, Maryland is still the richest state in the United States, and the Greater Washington Region is still No. 1 among U.S. metropolitan areas. So why should we worry about any of this?

Personally, I am not that concerned about how we stack up against other places. What I do worry about is the trend line in Montgomery County.

Nationally, we continue to see the lingering effects of the "Great Recession," with a decline in median family income this year of roughly 2 percent (from 2009 to 2010). The Washington region is bucking the trend and showed a slight increase this year over last. 

So, one might expect Montgomery County's median family incomes to be rising slightly as well. They are not. In fact, average family incomes in Montgomery County dropped more than twice as much as the national average, and are down this year by more than 4 percent. That’s right. Our incomes are dropping, twice as fast as the rest of the nation, even while the rest of our region improves.  

We can all speculate as to why: Government budget cuts, private sector jobs moving to Virginia, our stubborn unemployment rate.  But why is it just us? Loudoun County, Fairfax County, Howard County, Arlington County, Stafford County and Prince William County ALL showed net increases in family income from 2009 to 2010. We are the only one near the top of the list that is in actual decline. 

What does all this mean? We better start re-thinking some things.

If incomes continue to decline, even while our neighbors improve, what are we doing wrong? If we don’t start reversing this trend, how will we be able to afford the current level of county services we’ve come to expect, including our much vaunted school system, in the years ahead?

Let’s face it, we are no longer the county everyone looks up to. We have been surpassed.

Maybe it’s time to start looking around us for answers. They all put a lot more focus on business attraction and retention than we have been. Perhaps there’s a place to start …

Related Topics: Census, Montgomery County wealth, and Small Business

John Thompson

9:51 am on Sunday, September 25, 2011

Our expensive County Government will slowly kill us all

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Chism

3:16 pm on Sunday, September 25, 2011

I agree!!! I'm from San Diego...been here 3 years...and my property taxes are higher here!

Crestwood guy

11:36 am on Sunday, September 25, 2011

Two of the wealthiest states in the country can't live within their means so they steal tax revenues on incomes earned within DC boundaries. No other states in the country are able to piggardly feast on other jurisdictions like Maryland and Virginia do. Helps me empathize with residents of the West Bank in Palestine.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Democracy Works

11:06 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Crestwood guy, you obviously never worked in any of New York City's 5 Boroughs. If you work in NYC and live in New Jersey, Connecticut, or any other New York County other than Manhattan, Kings, Queens, Bronx, and Richmond, you have to fill out an additional NYC Government form with your income taxes. It's the penalty for making money in the City and living elsewhere.

Comment_arrow

Corbin Dallas Multipass

8:55 am on Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Yes, I can see how living in a state where actual acts of terrorism fueled by centuries of conflict driven by religious beliefs is exactly the same as paying some additional taxes. Pete Hoekstra, is that you? http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/pete-hoekstra#.ToHGhNToZ8E

Comment_arrow

C. P. Zilliacus

9:21 am on Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Crestwood, I have a solution to this problem that would also eliminate the (offensive) colonial status of the District of Columbia and its residents. It's called "retrocession," and would provide for all or very nearly all of the present-day District of Columbia to be retroceded back to Maryland, presumably to become an independent city (which Maryland law allows, Baltimore is currently the only one).

Marie ciliberti

1:55 pm on Sunday, September 25, 2011

But.....but.... almost every one of the legislators who ran for office in Montgomery County (and were elected to Annapolis in 2010) said that Montgomery County was tops. Could they have been mistaken? All the officials elected to the top spots in the County said the same. Could they have been reading the wrong statistics. Or could that have been just election hype and is Montgomery County on the decline as all indicators say? A narrow river separates us from Virginia but that state whose residents have a better standard of living has a totally different mindset when it comes to taxation, business and the freedom of the individual. I moved here at the zenith of the County's lustre and am moving (if I can sell my condo) at the point of its rapid decline. Some one has some 'splainin' to do.

Reply
Comment_arrow

C. P. Zilliacus

7:21 am on Tuesday, September 27, 2011

And what's in Virginia that Montgomery needs improved ground access to is Dulles Airport. That is a huge part of the difference. Taxes are not really that much different.

SlightlyDifferentViewpoint

3:26 pm on Sunday, September 25, 2011

Maybe it's the fact that the school system is forever cannibalized by the county as a means to "balance the budget". Or the sense of superiority over other counties that is put out there? Or it could just be that MoCo is one of THE most expensive area's I've ever lived in and get the least from in services. Whatever it is, I really don't believe for a NY minute it will change.

Reply

Conservative

5:28 pm on Sunday, September 25, 2011

Sanctuary state and county status for Maryland and MoCo. Illegals flood into this state and county. Also, single party government at its worst

Reply
Comment_arrow

Democracy Works

11:08 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Then I hope when you put an addition on your house, have any major appliances serviced & updated, or have your car looked at that you're paying a Union worker or another hard working American. If Day Laborers visit your home for any reason - landscaping, pool servicing - shame on you.

Comment_arrow

Betty Kuck

1:06 am on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

The sanctuary status of MOCO attracts those whose income is lower, which effects the average income for the county, which brings us down relative to the other states/counties we are compared to.
Another concern that is not being recognized, is the slipping of our position in education. Relative to the international rankings, we are only in the 50 percentile. We are deluding ourselves with our boasting of our great schools.

tom

9:28 pm on Sunday, September 25, 2011

liberals, illegals, and Democrats. Bring in the illegals to keep the Democrats in office. I'm on the way out; a business owner and taxpayer leaving MoCo in the downward spiral.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jnrentz1

10:16 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

We will be out in a couple of years, we hope. We wish to move south for less winter, fewer restrictive laws, fewer illegals and less crowding.

tom r

3:26 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

I already left Monkey County. I should have left it 20 years ago though. Gridlocked roads, arrogant controlling government, and too many people believe they are God's gift. There is little to no hope for that place.

Reply

jdog

6:55 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

I agree with "Tom", he hit it right on with the illegals, those people are getting all these cuts and there just letting them in here for nothing and they cant afford all the taxes or anything that is put on a burden to them. that goes for the whole country and it a area that really needs to get looked at. these people come in here and get social security and they have put anything into it. no wonder there isn't going to be any social security in the years to come. we the people need to really think about the people we elect and put into the government.

Reply

Maria Fusco

7:23 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Thanks SD Viewpoint: "Maybe it's the fact that the school system is forever cannibalized by the county as a means to 'balance the budget.'" If Brickyard School site conversion (to Private "Pay to Play" Soccer); that means 235+ acres of public school land will have been transferred to Private hands since 1994. Now MCPS is trying to use Park Land to build schools (and places where "Open Space" funding was used to purchase): STOP BRICKYARD CONVERSION; and BE WARY of Who We VOTE INTO MoCo BOARD of ED.

Reply

Peter Mork

7:40 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

It's not just MoCo, and it's not just the DC area. What we're observing is the ripple of gentrification. As downtown areas gentrify, the disadvantaged are displaced to the suburbs. Given the limited amount of space in the center of the metropolitan area, upper-middle and lower-upper incomes flee further out, into the exurbs of Loudoun and Howard counties. To suggest a conspiracy by liberals and illegals is, at best, disingenuous.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Hawkins

8:01 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

It's not a conspiracy and I'm not sure anyone suggested such. What it is, is a "result" of said keypoints. Loudoun and Howard will follow....it's just a matter of time.

Comment_arrow

Peter Mork

8:58 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

"Bring in the illegals to keep the Democrats in office." This certainly suggests a conspiracy. Somehow there's a link between importing illegals and garnering votes?

But, I agree with the premise that Loudoud and Howard will follow. These donut holes will ripple out, before reappearing as downtown blight. It's just long-term economic cycles.

Greg

7:40 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Interesting comments above. While the issues have seemingly been mentioned here is a recap:
Overtly liberal government
Burdensome social programs
Aging infrastructure
Taxes Taxes Taxes, the insane fuel surcharge, the more than insane energy taxes on our electricity causes businesses to not locate here, but to utilize the exact same electricity in NOVA for 1/5 the cost!
This is easy, business goes where the local government is receptive and welcoming and makes it easy to locate there. Business brings employees, paychecks, demand for housing, etc, it's economy 101...

Our Local Government is not doing us a good enough job. Plain and simple, Put a successful business person in charge of the government instead of a politician. Same for our State and Federal Govt.... It's really not that hard to understand...

Reply
Comment_arrow

jnrentz1

10:20 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Greg:

Please do not forget the asinine anti-truck ordinance which has, and is, driving out many skilled blue collar workers.

Maria Fusco

7:44 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Add to DCGuy: "Very high tax rates, unnecessary laws and regulations that are selectively but not methodically reinforced, emphasis on development in already developed and wealthy parts of the county...." Key point: CIRCUMVENTION OF PROCESS. MoCo BOE has no oversight committee: Perhaps County Execs has taken advantage of this point (?); however, likely TAXES WILL GO UP to fund the infrastructure to put PRIVATE soccer fields on (Brickyard Public Land) in affluent section of MoCo (w/4% soccer field surplus); while soccer fields in other MoCo soccer-needed areas (up to -43%) have soccer fields being taken away. Add also, that same site has one-of-kind organic farmer in whole County (and only 1 more similar in whole state) who has stewarded land 30+ yrs, and suggests Educ. Programs for our County students (GREEN, Local & Sustainable). Farmer has not added to tax increases; rather, saved us $, and has ability to offer what our country (and County?) promotes.

Reply

Maria Fusco

7:54 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

On decrease income: Many residents in MoCo have/had their own businesses (both affluent and not), and times are hard for businesses ~ so higher income lost, and hard, even for previous business owners, to find jobs.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Betty Kuck

1:17 am on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Good points. But look at the reasons for the problem. One party political system leads to limited views on how to conduct the business of government.
The Democrats answer is to have high taxes and restrictive regulations. this is antigrowth and leads to loss of businesses and thus, loss of jobs; this leads to less revenues to meet the high demands of our citizens in this area. It is circular. there is a need for a progrowth mentality which is brought about by lower taxes and less restrictions.

Theresa Defino

8:05 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Interesting comments, indeed. And no facts to back up a single one.

For starters, the numbers cited are suspect. As the news story says:

"However, census officials warned against making a definitive comparison between the two years, saying that the earlier figures were based on the 2000 population count and the latter, the 2010 count -- making the comparison susceptible to spikes."

The point is this: we still have wealth beyond imagining on the rest of the planet. The average income worldwide is $5k, with 3/4 of the population below that.

Let's take the MoCo average income of $2010 at $89,155 (down from $93,199)
That puts us in the top 0.73% richest people in the world.

Actual numbers: http://washingtonexaminer.com/local/2011/09/washington-area-richest-nation-last-year

The calculator: http://globalrichlist.com/

The gap between the rich and poor is growing. "Burdensome social programs" are not keeping up with demands and needs. Let's make sure we are taking care of people who need help, let's stop the wars and refrain from bringing Tea Party politics into this.

Show me better income numbers in a state run by Republicans. And if you want to compare Virginia, remember the current governor took office in Jan 2010 and has not been in long enough to be credited with any income rise. Virginia. has had Dem. governors since 2002. Funny, huh?

Reply

JH

8:29 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

We can thank the current and former county executives for the flood of impoverished poeple into Montgomery County. They created the current mess.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Theresa Defino

9:09 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Repeating a falsehood doesn't make it true.

Comment_arrow

Democracy Works

11:11 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

I hope you never hire a Day Laborer to do anything for your home. No cleaning maids, no lawn service, pool service, car maintenance, window replacements, a new deck, and addition to your house. I'm assuming you pay top dollar for all blue collar work when the money is coming out of your pocket?

Comment_arrow

Sharon Adams

9:30 am on Tuesday, September 27, 2011

I am sure glad, JH, you mentioned 'former' County Executive(s) in the fray. Good ole Douglas Duncan was a great catalyst to the mess we are in. He became the 'best bud' to the 'influx' in the County helping to increase the 'pinch' we are feeling in our public schools and strain on healthcare, etc. He 'ran' after damages rendered.

Comment_arrow

C. P. Zilliacus

12:48 pm on Tuesday, September 27, 2011

JH, blaming current and former Montgomery County Executives for demographic and population changes is very WRONG, for the simple reason that in Montgomery County, planning and land use decisions (which strongly influence the demographics of the county population) are entirely within the jurisdiction of the County Council, NOT the County Executive (except in certain municipalities, including Gaithersburg, Poolesville and Rockville, where the municipal government (still not the County Executive) has such powers). The County Executive does NOT approve master plan and zoning changes anywhere in Montgomery County - the holder of the office can merely comment on proposed plan changes, and that's about all. So please learn something about how Montgomery County operates before bashing any county executive, be it the late Jim Gleason or Ike Leggett or Doug Duncan (I regard them all as decent and honorable people).

Comment_arrow

JH

1:39 pm on Tuesday, September 27, 2011

NIce try C P Zilliacus. These executive are very nice people, but their policies in some areas are wrong. We cannot let elected executives get away with saying I inherited the problem or that the other branch of government is responsible. You must be naive or think we are ----- when you suggest the County Executive has had little to do with the current state of affairs in Montgomery County. As I recall, Legget served on the Council for 16 years before becoming County Executive ( and Council Pres for some of that period). Even if you take the naive position that the County Executive has little influence over land use decisions because of the Council's role, he did lead the Council for many years. Mr. Ducan is another story, but time does not permit a full review.

Comment_arrow

C. P. Zilliacus

1:52 pm on Tuesday, September 27, 2011

JH, I am speaking of county law, not my own opinions. From the Montgomery County Web site (and note that there is no mention of the County Executive):

http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/csltmpl.asp?url=/content/council/about/land.asp

"The County Council is the final authority on land use matters. The Council’s powers include approval or area master plans, functional master plans such as the master plan for bikeways and the master plan for historic preservation, as well as decisions about the zoning on individual parcels. The Council also approves changes in the Zoning Ordinance."

RC

8:44 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

I see MoCo as a larger representation of what is happening to America overall. I mean, when you have other neighboring counties effectively throwing out lower income people by either their very pricey zoning laws (Loudon) or their stance on immigration (Stafford and Frederick). Add to that MoCo very open and understanding attitude toward lower income and illegal, such as very honorable social programs, housing programs, in-state tuition at Mo College and uninterested in citizenship of residents - then of course they'll flock here and possibly some upper income will leave here and thus our overall wealth will be effected to the negative. I am not imposing whether this is all right or wrong, just that it is impacting our coffers period and that being too "nice" might have an effect on the overall - not shocking to me in the least. I do feel though that some steps should be taken while still remaining "nice."

Reply

Caroline taylor

9:04 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Current Mess? While there is much to improve in MC, including transparency in decision making, a diverse population is not among them. We should be striving to provide for decent paying jobs for all, not merely the upper end of the spectrum.

If you want to hang with only the uber rich, join one of the many fine country clubs...

Caroline Taylor

Reply

John

9:05 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

10% on the far left are nuts. 10% on the far right are nuts. The country as a whole has done better when there is palace of parties. When one party left or right has to much power they will always drift farther to the side of electability. All the comments above have merit now if we had the right people in office to hash out the right compromises things would get better. I am very competitive in nature and always strive to be the best in the 14 businesses I own and run and could care less if we are richer then most if we are in a downward trend it's a problem that needs to be addressed. The attitude that we are still wealthy and it's ok is a loose g mentality. Always strive to be the best and be on top but don't forget those less fortunate. Not a sermon just a thought.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Hawkins

10:07 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Pretty honest assessment John, you "nailed it". This County has long been in control by basically one party and at times it has served us well, there is no denying it. At the same time though there are consequences because of this control.

We are now suffering from some of those consequences and have been for awhile now. Some from that 10% you mention will scream "hate", "Tea Party", "racism" etc. all in an attempt to divert attention........it's called partisanship and sometimes it's blind.

Comment_arrow

C. P. Zilliacus

7:55 am on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Regarding parties - one of the big problems is that all current members of the Montgomery County Council are Democrats (as am I), The Democratic primary elections are usually low-turnout affairs, which gives groups representing the Idamae Garrott legacy (Greens, assortments of self-styled civic organizations, Sierra Club and other anti-growth/anti-mobility/anti-highway special interest groups) and public employee unions a disproportionate amount of influence over the next County Council.

Comment_arrow

C. P. Zilliacus

8:00 am on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Back in the 1960's, there was interest in building a large and stable MIDDLE CLASS in Montgomery County. Since then we've been hung up on so-called environmental protection (something better left to the state or federal governments), growth regulation, attempts to restrict mobility, all of which have chased-away a large chunk of the middle class to other counties in Maryland (invariably "further out" from D.C., like Howard, Carroll, Frederick) or to Pennsylvania or Northern Virginia or even eastern West Virginia. Some of the promoters of Montgomery County's strict growth controls (which predate so-called Smart Growth by decades) have attempted to rationalize those controls by claiming that persons moving out of Montgomery would instead move to the District of Columbia or Prince George's County, but I see little evidence of that.

jag

10:50 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Wow. 90% of these comments are beyond baseless. So this county used to have low taxes, no immigrants, and was Republican controlled? Darn Democrats and Mexicans came in and ruined everything! Good grief. We're still uber rich, but now we have urban areas that can compete with DC and attract young couples/families. Of course college grads in their 20s and living in Bethesda and Silver Spring are going to bring down the median salary of the old, suburban, white MoCo, but by no means is MoCo turning into a ghetto or something. Sorry to ruin the day of AARP members living in Potomac, but the MoCo of decades past is gone for good. We're young, not all rich lawyers, and are here to stay.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jag

11:00 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Seriously, it's so obvious that the demographics of the county have changed. 20 years ago it was primarily just white, suburban, single family homes. All of the growth over the last 10 years has been urbanization to attract young, educated, condo-owners. Of course that growth has resulted in a lower median income, since instead of attracting 10 people in their 40s you attracted 100 people in their 20s. What on earth does it have to do with politics or illegals??? The county is healthy and growing - get over it if it's people who aren't white or aren't interested in buying your 1/2 acre of land in the middle of nowhere.

Comment_arrow

Jeff Hawkins

11:35 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

"So this county used to have low taxes, no immigrants, and was Republican controlled? "

Jag...that comment pretty much disqualifies you as one to be taken seriously if that is what you "think" MoCo was like.

Comment_arrow

jag

11:45 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Jeff Hawkins, I was pointing out the idiocy of other commenters who apparently think MoCo used to be Republican and low-tax and now Democrats have shown up and ruined everything. Sorry that went over your head.

RC

11:01 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

I am not AARP, nowhere close at 37 and I am no lawyer that's for sure, and not rich... but I am a parent and when those 20 somethings have kids, they'll want to know that their public school system remains tops, I promise you that. Currently, MoCo is cutting teachers, cutting funding, cutting availability to capitalize on Mont. College.... these are real issues and they are certainly based at least in-part by our declining tax base and our increase tax liability overall. This is so much larger than a partisan issue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jag

11:40 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

...except, Montgomery County hasn't cut a single teaching position, the public school operating budget is perfectly intact, and Mont. College budget has actually increased...so it certainly appears MoCo will remain focused on education. Which, I agree, 20-somethings will/do care about. MoCo will be perfectly fine if it can keep its 20-somethings around, not only when they're making $50K (dragging down the median income numbers), but also when they're 50 and making $150K (lifting the median income numbers). MCPS will play a huge role in whether or not MoCo will be able to keep the healthy stable of new, young, residents it's attracted over the last decade.

Jeff Hawkins

11:53 am on Monday, September 26, 2011

Jag's comment:
"Jeff Hawkins, I was pointing out the idiocy of other commenters who apparently think MoCo used to be Republican and low-tax and now Democrats have shown up and ruined everything. Sorry that went over your head."

Nobody claimed low taxe's or Republican control, you did. As for calling people idiots for expressing their viewpoints is...............well troubling. My prior comment stands.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jag

12:47 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

In case you haven't read the comments, there are a couple of people who keep feeding off of each other saying that the Democrats and high taxes have turned MoCo into some crappy county. Obviously, for such a statement to even make sense, that'd mean the county used to be Republican and a low tax state/county. Which it wasn't. So those comments are nonsensical and oblivious to fact or reason. I apologize if "idiocy" is seriously a word that offends your sensibilities.

RC

12:27 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

You are wrong if you think the MCPS has not been effected negatively - this link shows you that we did not meet Maintenance of Effort (MOE) this year and therefore paid a fine: http://mocosmob.blogspot.com/2011/01/ike-leggett-mcps-will-pay-fine-instead.html. In addition, we have 2500 more students this year than last and not the same per pupil because of that - and there were 400 positions eliminated and trust me it shows. We have less paras, less assistance and less office staff. And, our teachers aren't getting raises and our class-sizes have increased across the board by 1 student. Did you have 28 kids in your kindergarten class with one teacher? And, this has all occurred over time and more dramatically over the course of the most recent years. see this link for more info. direct from MCPS: http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/press/index.aspx?page=showrelease&id=2908. MCPS is still a great school, some of the best in the state (but not the best anymore) and I am sure we'd like it to stay great. To do that, we need money for the schools, plain and simple.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Hawkins

12:39 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

RC: I agree.....

Many, many support staff positions cut, hiring freeze for quite awhile now, spending freeze on supplies, no raises of any kind for the past four years for employees with no hopes for one in the future, increased class size. A downward trend that sadly will not end soon.

Comment_arrow

jag

12:39 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Agreed. I wasn't trying to contend that MoCo hasn't been negatively affected by the economy, but it isn't true that MCPS has laid off teachers and I do believe MoCo has been clear in it's budgetary allocation that it very much understands the importance of its public school system.

Comment_arrow

Peter Mork

12:58 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

MCPS failed to meet the MOE because of the way in which MOE is calculated. Basically, you can never decrease education funding. However, MCPS increased funding considerably during the boom years (from your own link: "For years, county officials pumped millions of dollars more than required into the schools"). Basically, because MCPS increased funding several years ago, it's now getting burned by the state.

RC

1:03 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

I just have to laugh - I don't know many kindergarteners let's say, who understand the stake in their education. I think we as a country impose that on them and then maybe, just maybe over time they might come to understand the importance. But when you have a class of 28 kindergarteners, very common in MCPS, and some of those kids have special needs, or are ESOL or are on the normal continumum of good and bad behaviors and good and not so good academically - and one teacher -I think that might have something to do with how good or not good they end up learning. I don't think you can expect all children to learn under any circumstance. And, 50% or not, it's worked in the past, we just don't have the revenues - and let's face it - when our schools are the best we get the revenues, it's cyclical. But, if we keep continuing to not have the money, not have the revenues, you see where I'm going. Your point about paying for people who don't pay taxes is well taken - just another impact of the counties around us cracking down and us not.

Reply

RC

1:04 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

I don't feel that we used to be republican, I know that's not the case, but our democratic nature and our willingness to under all circumstances be "nice" has put us where we are today - in contrast to the neighboring counties who are not at all as "nice." In the past, it's been OK because we've been more wealthy, but we're just not there anymore overall in comparison to yesteryear, as this article clearly portrays. It's a dilema because I still think we should be "nice" just reasonably so.

Reply

Jeff Hawkins

1:13 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Jag comment:
"In case you haven't read the comments, there are a couple of people who keep feeding off of each other saying that the Democrats and high taxes have turned MoCo into some crappy county.
Obviously, for such a statement to even make sense, that'd mean the county used to be Republican and a low tax state/county."

It's not obvious, they could be Libertarian, Green Party, non-Partisan alltogether, etc. ?, to assume is not good.
As for who runs the show in MoCo, it's normally been the Democrat party. Hence the perception of ownership for the problems concerning the County. I'm quite certain that if the Republican party was the party of choice in MoCo and were experiencing the same set of troubles, the liberal types would be screaming loudly.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jag

1:31 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

So the people who are blaming Democrats for turning the county into crap think that the county used to be run by the Green Party or Libertarians? Umm...I'll give the commenters more credit than that. Obviously no one could think Libertarians used to run a county of 1 million people.

"I'm quite certain that if the Republican party was the party of choice in MoCo and were experiencing the same set of troubles, the liberal types would be screaming loudly."

Oh, okay, so that makes it right? No, obviously that'd be just as ignorant.

JH

1:18 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

The public schools, police, corrections, and health / social services ----- all of these agencies and more have been overwhelmed by the flood of impoverished people from other areas of our country and from across the globe. These are not young educated professionals. They don't pay their fair share in taxes ----- in fact, most don't pay a dime in income tax (federal, state or local income tax). They ride for free. I recognize that some taxpayers are ready and willing to pay more in order to support the added demand and stress on public services. Good for them, but please don't pretend that this problem does not exist or that we just need to accept it as the new normal. Hold elected leaders accountable for their mistakes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Peter Mork

1:28 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Reducing taxes to income taxes hides the fact that low income people still pay taxes: they pay property taxes (unless they're homeless) and they pay sales taxes. An influx of immigrants is not unique to MoCo. Urban centers are where the jobs are, but these same urban centers are gentrifying. This pushes low wage earners further out: to MoCo, Fairfax and PG, for example. The exurbs (Loudoun and Howard) are seeing their average incomes increase as the wealthiest relocate. Eventually, the inner suburbs will gentrify and the low-income donut will push even further out, until living downtown becomes more economically viable. The whole article (and the comments) sound like we're complaining that MoCo is more affordable than some its neighbors further in and further out.

Comment_arrow

JH

4:38 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Peter ---- think about it. Because you pay your water bill does not mean you can skip out on your telephone and electric bills. Can you get away with telling Uncle Sam that you did not fle an income tax return, but you did pay sales tax? Moreover, the small amount paid in these cases ( for sales and property taxes ) does not begin to pay the full cost of providing public services.

Comment_arrow

Peter Mork

7:25 am on Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Low-income workers have (effectively) negative income tax rates. So, when they fail to pay income taxes, they are actually benefiting the tax coffers. They pay the same sales tax as everyone else (so it's only a small amount because they don't have much income), ditto property tax. I have thought about it, and irrelevant analogies don't change the fact that (from the perspective of tax ramifications) illegals are not the bogeyman. If anything, they're a benefit.

Comment_arrow

jnrentz1

8:50 am on Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Peter Mork said in part:

7:25am on Tuesday, September 27, 2011

"Low-income workers have (effectively) negative income tax rates. So, when they fail to pay income taxes, they are actually benefiting the tax coffers."

********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Let me and others understand this:

...when they sail to pay income taxes, they are actually benefiting the tax coffers.

And how is NOT paying taxes benefiting the tax coffers?

And:

"I have thought about it, and irrelevant analogies don't change the fact that (from the perspective of tax ramifications) illegals are not the bogeyman. If anything, they're a benefit."

********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Let me understand you. A group of illegal aliens, who are criminal offenders, who should NOT be in America in the first place, benefit us?

How?

And why is this tolerable?

Comment_arrow

Peter Mork

10:25 am on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

"Let me and others understand this: ...when they sail to pay income taxes, they are actually benefiting the tax coffers. And how is NOT paying taxes benefiting the tax coffers?"

Because of the Earned Income Tax Credit (and other credits), these workers have a negative income tax rate. So, by paying 0% instead of the -6% that an American worker would "pay" (i.e., receive as a credit), they are not depleting the tax coffers by receiving credits. In other words, given their earnings, they would not pay income tax anyway, and by failing to file, they don't receive the payouts that a legal worker would be entitled to.

"Let me understand you. A group of illegal aliens, who are criminal offenders, who should NOT be in America in the first place, benefit us?"

There's a reason I restricted my comments to tax ramifications. I deliberately avoided claiming other ramifications, which are often harder to quantify.

Jeff Hawkins

1:21 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Peter's comment:

"From a purely tax/benefit perspective, illegal immigrants are good for the county"

Perhaps we should try harder to import as many illegals as possible? You know.........for that tax/benefit perspective.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jag

1:37 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Newsweek: Why Americans Think (Wrongly) That Illegal Immigrants Hurt the Economy

"The American public overwhelmingly thinks they’re bad. In a recent New York Times/CBS News poll, 74 percent of respondents said illegal immigrants weakened the economy, compared to only 17 percent who said they strengthened it. Yet the consensus among most economists is that immigration, both legal and illegal, provides a small net boost to the economy. Immigrants provide cheap labor, lower the prices of everything from produce to new homes, and leave consumers with a little more money in their pockets. They also replenish—and help fund benefits for—an aging American labor force that will retire in huge numbers over the next few decades. Also, an increase in the number of American workers is needed to prevent the U.S. from having too few working-age adults to pay for retiree benefits in a few decades, as many European nations currently do."

Oh, but it's just the liberal media with it's elitist economics and numbers, right?

Comment_arrow

Peter Mork

2:17 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

I never recommended that course of action. I don't think that increasing the tax base is an end by itself. I'm merely refuting the oft-held belief that illegal immigrants are a horrible drain on our tax coffers. I'm sure there are counter-examples, but on-the-whole (at the current level of immigration), and solely from the perspective of tax revenue, illegal immigration is not an evil.

Comment_arrow

jag

2:26 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Exactly, Peter. Not to mention the % of illegal immigrants in Fairfax County (the 2nd richest county in the country) is HIGHER than it is in MoCo. But hey, obviously illegals are to blame for everything and facts mean nothing.

Comment_arrow

JH

5:06 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Seems like this has moved into a kind of debate about illegal immigrants. Reference the Newsweek poll that jag has noted. There are always factors that may not be clear on the surface when you read these artilces. If you look at the underlying studies of the impact of illegal immigation, you will find that the economists assumed a certain level of economic growth in our economy. Not to get too far into the details, but these economists would agree that the net boost to the economy would only take place when our economy is growing at 5 % or more. Sadly, during the recession of recent years and even now, our economy has declined or is growing very slowly. Therefore, there is no net benefit. There are numerous other limitations with the studies, but time does not permit further discussion here.

RC

1:25 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

I understand very well MOE - but it still shows that we are paying less per pupil then before, period. So, while our school-system was fantastic before per pupil (over and above), we've now cut it down, considerably per pupil, esp. with the boom in public school enrollment. Any way you look at, any way you chose to slice it, it has negatively impacted our schools that we have less overall income.

Reply

Jeff Hawkins

1:46 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Jag's comment:
"So the people who are blaming Democrats for turning the county into crap think that the county used to be run by the Green Party or Libertarians? Umm...I'll give the commenters more credit than that. Obviously no one could think Libertarians used to run a county of 1 million people."

(Ummmm......you are still assuming quite alot, you left out non-party affiliation that I listed also....you know......independents.)

"I'm quite certain that if the Republican party was the party of choice in MoCo and were experiencing the same set of troubles, the liberal types would be screaming loudly."

Oh, okay, so that makes it right? No, obviously that'd be just as ignorant.

( Never said it made it right! )

Reply

Jeff Hawkins

1:57 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Jag's comment:

Newsweek: Why Americans Think (Wrongly) That Illegal Immigrants Hurt the Economy

"The American public overwhelmingly thinks they’re bad. In a recent New York Times/CBS News poll, 74 percent of respondents said illegal immigrants weakened the economy, compared to only 17 percent who said they strengthened it. Yet the consensus among most economists is that immigration, both legal and illegal, provides a small net boost to the economy. Immigrants provide cheap labor, lower the prices of everything from produce to new homes, and leave consumers with a little more money in their pockets. They also replenish—and help fund benefits for—an aging American labor force that will retire in huge numbers over the next few decades. Also, an increase in the number of American workers is needed to prevent the U.S. from having too few working-age adults to pay for retiree benefits in a few decades, as many European nations currently do."

Oh, but it's just the liberal media with it's elitist economics and numbers, right?

(I suppose if I hunted long enough, I could find an article that states "most economists" agree that illegal immigration is NOT good.)

( But hey, why settle for a "small net boost" when we could go for the big one.......bring more illegals........the more the merrier)

( Who mentioned the elitist liberal media?)

Reply

C. P. Zilliacus

2:17 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Rich, I agree with your points here. A few of my own:

(1) A good school system is good, but that is NOT enough to maintain our position (I am a K-12 graduate of MCPS).

(2) Most of the problem has been caused by Democrats, but there are a few Republicans deserving of blame as well.

(3) In the 1960's, Montgomery County was the wealthiest in the U.S.

(4) In those days, the Virginia counties (including Loudoun and Fairfax) were considered inferior, and the Commonwealth was still damaged by the Byrd machine's "massive resistance" to school integration, something that Montgomery County has put behind itself.

In Montgomery, we have had DECADES of push-back against the 1960's, and especially against the so-called "Diggs Council," which led by the late Kathryn E. Diggs, was viewed as "too pro-development" in the 1960's (how quaint that sounds now), which then gave rise to the powerful anti-development and anti-highway County Councils under the control of the late Idamae Garrott (died 1999). And even though Garrott left the County Council in the 1970's and became a state delegate and later a state senator from District 19 (Aspen Hill), her opposition to all highway projects (and especially the ICC and other major improvements, like new crossings of the Potomac River (needed if for no other reason than to improve ground access to Dulles Airport)) remains (much like the former Soviet Union was led by Lenin from his grave) and has cost Montgomery County dearly.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Greg

2:36 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Well said.

Briefly, it costs more to operate a business and live in MOCO than it does in NOVA. If you are a business owner looking to locate here, you aren't coming to this side of the river, it's too onerous and expensive. It really is that simple. This is not a political party discussion, it is a discussion of why we are here and maybe how we could improve what we have. It's going to take a shift in the goals of the county council (to start) to get it done, something that without education of the people who vote 'liberal' will not likely accept.

Comment_arrow

Jason Ledesma

9:29 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

C. P. Zilliacus, you're right, but for the wrong reasons. We do need more progressive leaders in our county, but the examples you are citing lead to the exact opposite of what we want. The ICC? That road to nowhere was created in the 1950's as a part of a new, "innovative" Outer Beltway, which would have caused unimaginable sprawl and urban decay. Also, are you implying that a road to Dulles Airport, situated in Loundon County, Virginia, the now richest county in the United States, would improve our economic situation?
Here's what we need to do, following your pro-progressive argument;

(1) Increase density in the urban core. The majority of the "immigration" that our MoCo residents have been complaining about are concentration in East County urban areas like Silver Spring and Wheaton. If we make livable urban centers and put priority on more people in a smaller area, it will be easier to not only manage our economy, but reap the benefits as well.
(2) Improve transportation in the core. Every time I pass by a gargantuan parking lot in this county, I cringe- in a place with an extensive transit system like MoCo, there is no reason to drive. If we were less reliant on cars, then maybe people wouldn't have to complain about the gas tax in the first place, and if everyone used mass transit, billion dollar roads (like the ICC) would remain redundant.
(3) More businesses. Which are attracted by urban centers. Which are situated around transit centers. It all comes full circle.

Comment_arrow

C. P. Zilliacus

7:33 am on Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Jason, I bought a home (back in 1985) right near the ICC in the Fairland Master Plan Area, and I did so after consulting the (otherwise deeply-flawed) 1981 Eastern Montgomery County Master plan, so I certainly don't regard the ICC as a "road to nowhere." I don't think residents of Shady Grove, Gaithersburg, Rockville, Olney, Colesville, Cloverly, White Oak, Aspen Hill and Leisure World regard their communities as "nowhere" either (and many of the homes there were approved with the understanding that the ICC would eventually get built - you may recall that when the County Council asked the M-NCP&PC Montgomery County Planning Department staff what it would take to remove the ICC from master plan documents, the response from the staff was "years"). Regarding increased density in the core (there's only one, and it's not in Montgomery County), I presume you mean downtown D.C. - that's a matter you will need to take up with Congress, which long ago passed a law limiting the height of D.C. buildings. Regarding "improved transportation to the core," we already did that - it's called Metrorail. And regarding businesses, they are frequently not interested in locating in "the core," and not interested in being so far from major airports as they are in Montgomery County (thanks to official county policy). Hence the growth in jobs in Northern Virginia along the Va. 267 (Dulles Toll Road) and I-66 corridors.

Online addict

2:25 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Pinning the issue on illegal immigrants is a sham. Many illegal immigrants are working multiple, cheap-labor jobs AND they ARE paying into social security, they are paying taxes on more things than you think. Employers who are not ponying up by collecting social security and paying their companies share are the ones cheating the system.

And as to the college tuition line item..... the cost to the State is conjecture at best. Enrollment at State schools is not at 100%, or even 85%. If the reduced rate for those immigrants is removed, there is a good chance they won't be able to afford going to school, then the State loses out on approximately $3500 per student! There is no net loss from providing in-State tuition, it is a sham by those estimating the numbers and implying legal residents are not getting in, or subdizing immigrants. Educate, educate, educate; it is the right thing to do!

Give me an educated mass of people and the world will be a better place. In reading the comments above, I believe many folks may have choosen not to take advantage of in-State tuition.

And finally, for those who want out of the State, good news, Metro goes to Virginia; bad news, it lets YOU come back.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Peter Mork

7:28 am on Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Exactly! I moved to MD because of its reputation for compassion, affordable housing and sensible education. I've never regretted it.

C. P. Zilliacus

5:29 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Joe Busch, I strongly agree. Illegal immigrants are NOT the source of our problems, and doing a Prince William County-style "crackdown" on them will NOT make Montgomery County better (and may make it worse). But our inability to build (or even retain) good-paying private-sector jobs IS the problem, and that relates to the misguided land use and transportation policies that our county has mostly followed since Idamae Garrott and her friends took power after the 1970 elections have severely damaged some communities and stagnated others, while protecting those areas of the county that are immensely wealthy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jnrentz1

6:28 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Not exactly,

Illegal aliens are a source of some of our problems, along with other sources and causes.

Christmas Decor by Hallco

5:55 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Its true, NYC is a lot worse than we have it. Yet, we are headed in the same direction NY is in no time at all. We seem to be right behind California and look where they are at? They've got no money!

Reply

Theresa Defino

6:20 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Not a single Dem-bashing, "illegal"-bashing commenter has answered my challenge. I said:

"Show me better income numbers in a state run by Republicans. And if you want to compare Virginia, remember the current governor took office in Jan 2010 and has not been in long enough to be credited with any income rise. Virginia. has had Dem. governors since 2002. Funny, huh?"

Reply
Comment_arrow

jnrentz1

6:26 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011

Are you OK?

I almost understand Dem-bashing. I think. I suppose you mean those against the Democratic Party. Is that what you mean?

But do not understand "illegal-bashing." If you mean illegal aliens, then you are describing a group of people in perpetual criminality who should not be in America in the first place.

Is that what you mean by illegal-bashing?

Al Veerhoff

10:17 pm on Thursday, September 29, 2011

It amazes me that so many writers are blaming politics and government (in)action for the changes in demographics. Most people who live here are here by choice; they are attracted by the schools, the living and working conditions, and (often) the size of the existing ethnic groups. If the county can accommodate low-wage workers, and it apparently can, then it stands to reason that the income levels per household will also change. This is a good thing; it means Montgomery is growing and becoming more diverse. Is Loudon County that diverse? Does it have large (and vibrant) ethnic groups such as we have here?
Trick question: Who is "The Mother of Exiles?" Do you know the poem that goes with that name? Extra points if you can sing it.

Reply

JH

7:46 am on Friday, September 30, 2011

Just look at the recent Washington Post article (front page) on the huge number of children in poverty. See how Montgomery County looks compared to other jurisdictions in this area? A flood of impoverished people into the County. Not a good thing no matter how much you wish to spin it or defend it. Not fair that County taxpayers must handle the extra burden.

Reply
Comment_arrow

C. P. Zilliacus

7:58 am on Friday, September 30, 2011

JH, do not assume that all of those impoverished people are undocumented aliens, because most of them are not. In many cases, even if the parents do not have legal status, they children DO by being born in the United States. But I am of the opinion that the whole debate about undocumented aliens is a smokescreen to detract from what is REALLY wrong with our county (and I disagree with claims that immigrants do not carry their weight, because I believe that they do). The United States (that includes Montgomery County) has ALWAYS been a nation of immigrants, even though our politicians in Washington have long tried (since the 1920's, during the Calvin Coolidge Administration) to demagogue the issue. But why are so many poor people (regardless of immigration status) coming to certain areas of Montgomery County?

Because the housing is available to them (and that is in part because previous residents have left thanks to misguided land use and transportation policies, including too much emphasis on mass transit), that's why, and because our public schools are rightly considered good.

Comment_arrow

JH

8:45 am on Friday, September 30, 2011

CPZ ---- you may have assumed that this poverty is all the result of illegal aliens, but I did not. It is reasonable to think a significant number are illegal and some may be the product of illegal immigrants, and still others are here in a legal fashion. Yes, we are a land of immigrants, but please don't suggest that all entered the country through illegal means. That is not the case and you know it. People that are here illegally should stop suggesting that it makes no difference whether you entered the country through the front door or the back door. We have always welcomed legal immigrants.

Comment_arrow

C. P. Zilliacus

9:03 am on Friday, September 30, 2011

JH, thanks for your comment - I happen to agree with you that we should encourage LEGAL immigration to this county. But like it or not, the U.S. economy (which no elected official in Montgomery County has much control over) has a voracious appetite for people willing to work at minimum or subminium wage (often in agricultural jobs), and many of the people willing to do such work are immigrants (legal or in many cases illegal).

Comment_arrow

C. P. Zilliacus

9:06 am on Friday, September 30, 2011

In a perfect world, we would provide housing and education (and hopefully employment) for some reasonable share of the poor people in our part of the world, but we would not go out of our way to attract people to live in certain parts Montgomery County just so we can brag about how much affordable housing we provide. Nor would we be an affordable housing "depot" for people that work in places outside of Maryland (including the District of Columbia).

Online addict

8:24 am on Friday, September 30, 2011

God Bless the USA! Go Maryland! Go Montgomery County!!!!!! So proud to live in a county that shares the wealth and allows those less fortunate to stay and have the opportunity to better themselves. Reminds me of a man who lived 2,000 years ago, who said let the children come to me for they are the future....okay, not an exact quote, but I believe the video may be on YouTube.
Nothing makes my morning coffee taste better than knowing my tax dollars are supporting those less endowed. Keep up the good work Montgomery County!!
We are all on this planet together, let's smile and help someone today, it's what that man said we need to do to get to a better place!!

Reply

C. P. Zilliacus

4:29 pm on Friday, September 30, 2011

Means testing for most forms of public assistance (including WIC and "food stamps") is done by the Department of Social Services, according to rules and laws established by the state (and also federal) governments. Section 8 units are indeed taxpayer-subsidized rental housing, and those have done SEVERE damage to my neighborhood in the East County. MPDUs (Moderately Priced Dwelling Units) are subsidized by the developers of new housing units (and by implicitly by purchasers of market-rate units), but those are at least OWNER-OCCUPIED by people with an OWNERSHIP interest in their homes, so they don't bother me nearly as much. Owners of MPDUs are (in general) not going to be able to qualify for most forms of public assistance, for they must have enough resources to qualify for and pay a mortgage every month. But ask yourself this - WHY do we need the MPDU program in the first place?

Reply

jag

11:41 pm on Friday, September 30, 2011

Out of curiosity, where do the whiny people live? Most of the county (population wise) has had a great decade, when looking at the downtowns of Bethesda, Silver Spring, Rockville, North Bethesda, etc. The amount of economic growth in just 10 years is mind blowing, especially considering the two Bush recessions suffered during that time. So...I guess that leaves older folks in suburbs bitter that no one wants to buy their crappy 50s housing stock these days? Here's a hint - that has nothing to do with immigrants or Democrats.

Reply

jnrentz1

8:39 am on Saturday, October 1, 2011

DCGUY:

An excellent and funny rejoinder to jag's "whiny" post.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jag

3:33 pm on Saturday, October 1, 2011

Dude, he's not trying to be funny. Don't be mean - he's entitled to an opinion, even if it's illogical.

JH

1:26 pm on Saturday, October 1, 2011

Seems like people now see a link ---- increased poverty in Montgomery County with the matter of illegal immigration. And I can understand why so many law abiding citizens don't want pay higher and higher taxes to support other people. Of course, some of you like to create a justification for illegal behavior and to insist that you are entitled to public assistance.
We will see how many of the illegal families from Alabama arrive in Montgomery County this week. Sad to see little school kids caught up in the mistakes of their parents.

Reply

Al Veerhoff

11:46 pm on Saturday, October 1, 2011

Nobody has identified "The Mother of Exiles" yet.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jnrentz1

5:20 am on Sunday, October 2, 2011

So what?

Who cares?

Sharon, it is not the Statue, it is the poem.

Sharon Adams

11:59 pm on Saturday, October 1, 2011

"As political propaganda for France, the Statue of Liberty was first intended to be a path of enlightenment for the countries of Europe still battling tyranny and oppression. Lazarus' words, however, turned that idea on its head: the Statue of Liberty would forever on be considered a beacon of welcome for immigrants leaving their mother countries."
http://xroads.virginia.edu/~cap/liberty/lazarus.html

Reply

Sharon Adams

10:57 am on Sunday, October 2, 2011

To jnrentz1: Reference to 'Mother of Exiles' is now associated with the Statue of Liberty. I do notice you have this thing about basically opposing (or correcting via your 'expertise') everyone who comments on Patch, argumentative mood. Hey, be nice. My Irish ancestors came to this county via legal route, Ellis Island. It was that or swim the backstroke! I'm not your 'enemy'. LOL!

Reply

Sharon Adams

11:04 am on Sunday, October 2, 2011

Actual name of poem: "The New Colossus" is a sonnet by Emma Lazarus (1849–1887), written in 1883 and, in 1903, engraved on a bronze plaque and mounted inside the Statue of Liberty."
"This poem was written as a donation to an auction of art and literary works conducted by the "Art Loan Fund Exhibition in Aid of the Bartholdi Pedestal Fund for the Statue of Liberty", the aim of which was to raise money for the pedestal's construction. The contribution was solicited by fundraiser William Maxwell Evarts. Initially Lazarus refused, but Constance Cary Harrison convinced her that the statue would be of great significance to immigrants sailing into the harbor."

"The New Colossus" was the only entry read at the exhibit's opening, but was forgotten and played no role at the opening of the statue in 1886. In 1901, Lazarus's friend Georgina Schuyler began an effort to memorialize Lazarus and her poem, which succeeded in 1903 when a plaque bearing the text of the poem was mounted on the inner wall of the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty.

The line "Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" has read "Keep ancient lands, your storied pomp!" on the plaque hanging inside the Statue of Liberty since its unveiling in 1903.

Reply

Sharon Adams

7:13 pm on Sunday, October 2, 2011

Quote from Article: "If we don’t start reversing this trend, how will we be able to afford the current level of county services we’ve come to expect, including our much vaunted school system, in the years ahead?"
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Tests_Scores_Too_Low_At_MoCo_High_Schools-130936598.html

Reply

Leave a comment